The David
Kepesh of The Dying Animal is a
divorced professor of literature, father to an estranged son, and a cultural
critic on television for the past fifteen years, a position that makes him
popular on campus, especially with his female students, attracted to his
celebrity status. Kepesh knows better than to have sexual relationships with
students, particularly because of subtle accusations of sexual harassment in
the past. He’s smart enough to wait until the end of the year and then host a
party at his flat, and wait for someone to spring into his trap. Usually
there’s always a student willing to spring it.
No, this
Kepesh isn’t very different from the other two, even if he seems different in
some details. Above all he’s still animated by lust and a need to sate it, and
he continues to get into predicaments because of his desires. Still this is a
Kepesh at the end of his erotic odyssey, as the title implies. One thing I must
give Philip Roth credit for is that he keeps coming up with new ways of addressing
the never-ending and perhaps insurmountable problem between man and sex. In The Breast, Kapesh is at war with his own body when it turns into a
gigantic erogenous zone of uncontrollable libido. This fantastic allegory gives
way to a more realistic bildungsroman
in The Professor of Desire, where Kepesh’s young, exciting, boundless
expectations of sex collide with the grim and dreary realities he experiences
in adulthood. In the final book of the trilogy Kepesh is fighting against old
age, in two ways: one through reminiscence and nostalgia; and the other through
continuing to seduce young women. He’s sixty-two when he starts a relationship
with twenty-four-year-old Consuela Castillo, the daughter of prosperous Cuban
expatriates living in Jersey.
Consuela is
a beautiful, charming young woman who likes literature and art and worships
culture. She’s not so much attracted to Kepesh’s physique as to his cultural
authority and his acting as her gateway to a new world of aesthetic experiences
in books, painting and music. Kepesh obliges her and becomes a sort of mentor
for her, all the while aware of and commenting on the social rituals that
dictate relationships:
I show her Kafka, Velázquez… why does one do
this? Well, you have to do something. These are the veils of the dance. Don’t
confuse it with seduction. This is not seduction. What you are disguising is
the thing that got you there, the pure lust. The veils veil the blind drive.
Talking this talk, you have a misguided sense, as does she, that you know what you’re
dealing with.
Experience
and disillusionment have made Kepesh a cynical observer of sex and
relationships. He’s been with too many women, suffered too many heartbreaks and
failed too many times to find the happiness of the fabled soul mate, to not have
an unglamorous opinion of it: “Sex is all the enchantment required. Do men find
women so enchanting once the sex is taken out? Does anyone find anyone of any
sex that enchanting unless they have sexual business with them? Who else are
you that enchanted by? Nobody.”
He’s less
interested in the emotional aspects of sex than in the power that underlies it.
For him sex is a struggle between submission and control, with the woman always
triumphing no matter what the man thinks:
A boy submitting to her power, what does that
amount to in a creature so patently desirable? But to have this man of the
world submitting solely because of the force of her youth and her beauty? To
have gained the total interest, to have become the consuming passion of a man
inaccessible in every other arena, to enter a life she admires that would
otherwise be closed to her – that’s power, and it’s the power she wants.
Besides
Kepesh’s thoughts about his relationship with Consuela, the reader is also
taken on a trip back in time to the 1960s, one of Kepesh’s favourite decades.
Having come out of age in the 1940s he’s too late to be an active propeller of
the sexual revolution, but his gaze is always alert when big changes are
occurring in society. And Kepesh dissects the sixties for all the wondrous
freedom they brought to young people in America and the fall of the last
redoubt of Puritanism. “Age-old American story: save the young from sex. Yet
it’s always too late. Too late because they’ve already been born,” he muses as
he thinks of all the students, men and women, who started challenging fashion
codes, sexual mores and being more open to a plurality of lifestyles. From this
era Kepesh, however, didn’t learn just the finer aspects: he also absorbed the
irresponsibility and selfishness of the time, which caused his marriage to
derail when his wife got tired of his frequent cheating. The result is a son,
now grown-up, who hates Kepesh for the anguish he allegedly caused his mother.
Kepesh sees
sex as a force that is beyond man’s control and that ultimately makes him
behave irrationally and even callously, part of human nature that can’t be
reasoned with or subdued. “No matter how much you know, no matter how much you
think, no matter how much you plot and you connive and you plan, you’re not
superior to sex.” This goes against the values of his son, Kenny, who has
absorbed instead all the conventional rules of behaviour. When Kenny
impregnates a woman he feels like his world is going to end because that wasn’t
in his plans. Kepesh reminds him that one of the fundamental tenets of American
history is individual freedom and that no one can force him to marry her, to
ruin his life because of her. But Kenny, who grew up hating everything his
father stood for, is almost neo-Victorian regarding morals and is prepared to
burden himself with an unhappy, unplanned marriage because it’s the right thing
to do, the responsible thing to do.
And yet
Kepesh too starts wrestling with his view of sexual relationships. After not
seeing Consuela for several years, after they abruptly broke off their
relationship, she contacts him to help her cope with her breast cancer: faced
with the horror of disfigurement, she wants to be close to him again, the man
who loved her body when it was perfect before it’s irremediably ruined forever.
Against his instincts he starts getting deeply involved in her life again,
finally showing a trace of vulnerability. Is this what makes him a dying
animal, this signal that he’s softening? Although it’s tempting to hope that
David Kepesh can meet some closure and happiness, it’s important to remember
that many times happiness seemed to be right in front of him throughout the
trilogy: with Birgitta in London, with Helen, his first wife, then with gentle
Claire. Every time there were signs he could never be fully happy with either
of them. Of course this is also the first time Kepesh is old so maybe that
changes his perspective.
The David
Kepesh trilogy is a curious, unbalanced, sometimes astute set of books. They’re
Roth’s clearest statement on man/woman relationships, sex and the pursuit, or
even existence, of happiness. They contain some of his best and worst writing.
But more interesting is how they record Roth’s own evolution as a writer. The
first Kepesh is very close to the ribald Alex Portnoy, perhaps his most famous
character, whereas the second Kepesh mirrors the funny but tinged in melancholy
observations of Nathan Zuckerman, whereas the third Kepesh seems to prefigure
the decadence of Zuckerman from Exit Ghost and also exemplify Roth’s more restrained type of writing he acquired
during the nineties. As a Roth fan, all Roth is essential Roth, but David
Kepesh is not essential writing, in my humble, rather he helps clarify some
aspects of his work.

I have not read this but Kepesh sounds very interesting. Roth plays with similar themes and characters over and over again, yet the works do seem different and I never tire at what he does with these motifs.
ReplyDeleteCase in point, some of the plot devices as well as Characters as you describe them here remind me of certain aspects of the The Human Stain.
Brian, I don't remember a lot from The Human Stain, save the theme of racism and the fascinating double life of Coleman Silk. I liked reading it, it's one of his more mature novels.
Delete